|
|
Registro Completo |
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste. |
Data corrente: |
13/12/2021 |
Data da última atualização: |
13/12/2021 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Artigo em Periódico Indexado |
Autoria: |
PALHARES, J. C. P.; MORELLI, M.; NOVELLI, T. I.; MÉO FILHO, P. DE; HISATUGU, M. T. |
Afiliação: |
JULIO CESAR PASCALE PALHARES, CPPSE; MARCELA MORELLI, USP; TÁISLA INARA NOVELLI, USP; PAULO DE MÉO FILHO, Rothamsted Research; MATHEUS TOSHIO HISATUGU, USP. |
Título: |
Comparison of two water measurement systems for feedlot beef cattle. |
Ano de publicação: |
2021 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Ambiente & Água, v.16, n.4, 2021. |
Páginas: |
7 p. |
ISSN: |
1980-993X |
DOI: |
https://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2729 |
Idioma: |
Inglês |
Conteúdo: |
The objective of this study was to compare cattle drinking water consumption collected electronically with that of direct human observation using water metres and to analyse whether an automated system compensates due to its greater precision. The study was conducted in the feedlot of Embrapa Pecuaria Sudeste. The reference unit had four pens: two with electronic drinkers and two with water metres. Experiment 1 utilised 52 Nelore steers and Experiment 2 utilised 44 Canchim steers. Nelore fed a conventional diet, the automated system median daily water intake (DWI) was higher than for animals drinking from the water metre, 17.9 L day-1 and 15.6 L day-1. The reverse was observed for animals fed the co-product diet, the automated system median DWI was 18.9 L day-1 and in the water metre pen was 23.0 L day-1. When the Canchim drank from water metres, the median DWI was lower than with the automated system group, 25.9 L day-1 and 27.8 L day-1, respectively. In Experiment 1, there was a statistical difference between the two sets of equipment for both diets. In Experiment 2, the animals were the same breed, had similar weights and were fed the same diet. There was no statistical difference between the equipment in these conditions. The results indicate that the water meter can have the same performance as high technology at a much lower cost. If a more simplified system for measuring water consumption has the same performance as an automated system, this will justify its use with environmental and economic advantages. MenosThe objective of this study was to compare cattle drinking water consumption collected electronically with that of direct human observation using water metres and to analyse whether an automated system compensates due to its greater precision. The study was conducted in the feedlot of Embrapa Pecuaria Sudeste. The reference unit had four pens: two with electronic drinkers and two with water metres. Experiment 1 utilised 52 Nelore steers and Experiment 2 utilised 44 Canchim steers. Nelore fed a conventional diet, the automated system median daily water intake (DWI) was higher than for animals drinking from the water metre, 17.9 L day-1 and 15.6 L day-1. The reverse was observed for animals fed the co-product diet, the automated system median DWI was 18.9 L day-1 and in the water metre pen was 23.0 L day-1. When the Canchim drank from water metres, the median DWI was lower than with the automated system group, 25.9 L day-1 and 27.8 L day-1, respectively. In Experiment 1, there was a statistical difference between the two sets of equipment for both diets. In Experiment 2, the animals were the same breed, had similar weights and were fed the same diet. There was no statistical difference between the equipment in these conditions. The results indicate that the water meter can have the same performance as high technology at a much lower cost. If a more simplified system for measuring water consumption has the same performance as an automated system, this will justify its use with ... Mostrar Tudo |
Palavras-Chave: |
Bebedouro eletrônico; Electronic drinkers; Pecuária de precisão; Precision livestock farming; Water meter. |
Thesagro: |
Hidrômetro. |
Categoria do assunto: |
X Pesquisa, Tecnologia e Engenharia |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/229006/1/ComparisonTwoWater.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 02336naa a2200277 a 4500 001 2137650 005 2021-12-13 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1980-993X 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.4136/ambi-agua.2729$2DOI 100 1 $aPALHARES, J. C. P. 245 $aComparison of two water measurement systems for feedlot beef cattle.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 300 $a7 p. 520 $aThe objective of this study was to compare cattle drinking water consumption collected electronically with that of direct human observation using water metres and to analyse whether an automated system compensates due to its greater precision. The study was conducted in the feedlot of Embrapa Pecuaria Sudeste. The reference unit had four pens: two with electronic drinkers and two with water metres. Experiment 1 utilised 52 Nelore steers and Experiment 2 utilised 44 Canchim steers. Nelore fed a conventional diet, the automated system median daily water intake (DWI) was higher than for animals drinking from the water metre, 17.9 L day-1 and 15.6 L day-1. The reverse was observed for animals fed the co-product diet, the automated system median DWI was 18.9 L day-1 and in the water metre pen was 23.0 L day-1. When the Canchim drank from water metres, the median DWI was lower than with the automated system group, 25.9 L day-1 and 27.8 L day-1, respectively. In Experiment 1, there was a statistical difference between the two sets of equipment for both diets. In Experiment 2, the animals were the same breed, had similar weights and were fed the same diet. There was no statistical difference between the equipment in these conditions. The results indicate that the water meter can have the same performance as high technology at a much lower cost. If a more simplified system for measuring water consumption has the same performance as an automated system, this will justify its use with environmental and economic advantages. 650 $aHidrômetro 653 $aBebedouro eletrônico 653 $aElectronic drinkers 653 $aPecuária de precisão 653 $aPrecision livestock farming 653 $aWater meter 700 1 $aMORELLI, M. 700 1 $aNOVELLI, T. I. 700 1 $aMÉO FILHO, P. DE 700 1 $aHISATUGU, M. T. 773 $tAmbiente & Água$gv.16, n.4, 2021.
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Pecuária Sudeste (CPPSE) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
URL |
Voltar
|
|
Registro Completo
Biblioteca(s): |
Embrapa Solos. |
Data corrente: |
27/10/1992 |
Data da última atualização: |
09/03/2023 |
Tipo da produção científica: |
Documentos |
Autoria: |
MENDES, W.; CASTRO, A. F. de. |
Afiliação: |
WALDEMAR MENDES, UFRJ; ABEILARD FERNANDO DE CASTRO, SNLCS. |
Título: |
Limitações do uso dos solos do Estado do Paraná por suscetibilidade à erosão. |
Ano de publicação: |
1984 |
Fonte/Imprenta: |
Rio de Janeiro: EMBRAPA-SNLCS, 1984. |
Páginas: |
14 p. |
Série: |
(EMBRAPA-SNLCS. Documentos, 8). |
ISSN: |
0103-0523 |
Idioma: |
Português |
Notas: |
Acompanha 1 mapa, color. Escala 1:600.000. |
Conteúdo: |
Introducao; Conceitos e criterios; Enquadramento das unidades de mapeamento nos graus de limitacao; Discussao; Conclusoes. |
Palavras-Chave: |
Brasil; Erosion; Paraná; Solos; Use; Uso; Zoneamento. |
Thesagro: |
Conservação do Solo; Erosão; Reconhecimento do Solo; Solo. |
Thesaurus NAL: |
Brazil; Soil; soil conservation. |
Categoria do assunto: |
-- P Recursos Naturais, Ciências Ambientais e da Terra |
URL: |
https://ainfo.cnptia.embrapa.br/digital/bitstream/item/62873/1/CNPS-DOC.-8-84.pdf
|
Marc: |
LEADER 00987nam a2200337 a 4500 001 1338150 005 2023-03-09 008 1984 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 022 $a0103-0523 100 1 $aMENDES, W. 245 $aLimitações do uso dos solos do Estado do Paraná por suscetibilidade à erosão. 260 $aRio de Janeiro: EMBRAPA-SNLCS$c1984 300 $a14 p. 490 $a(EMBRAPA-SNLCS. Documentos, 8). 500 $aAcompanha 1 mapa, color. Escala 1:600.000. 520 $aIntroducao; Conceitos e criterios; Enquadramento das unidades de mapeamento nos graus de limitacao; Discussao; Conclusoes. 650 $aBrazil 650 $aSoil 650 $asoil conservation 650 $aConservação do Solo 650 $aErosão 650 $aReconhecimento do Solo 650 $aSolo 653 $aBrasil 653 $aErosion 653 $aParaná 653 $aSolos 653 $aUse 653 $aUso 653 $aZoneamento 700 1 $aCASTRO, A. F. de
Download
Esconder MarcMostrar Marc Completo |
Registro original: |
Embrapa Solos (CNPS) |
|
Biblioteca |
ID |
Origem |
Tipo/Formato |
Classificação |
Cutter |
Registro |
Volume |
Status |
Fechar
|
Nenhum registro encontrado para a expressão de busca informada. |
|
|